What would be the better move for Nintendo with the Wii U, temporary price cut or use the money on a huge advertisement campaign

[Jay70sgamer]

Seece said:

RolStoppable said:

Seece said:

Yeah I do. Somehow Sony have managed 80m+ with every console they've delivered, yet Nintendo's track record isn't nearly as rosey, they've only ever had moderate hits and Wii is the outlier.

Getting anything to sell well is going to require Nintendo taking MS and Sony seriously as competition.

They don't have another shot at that casual market or an IT product, I was say it's impossible for them.

First time ever that someone described the NES as a moderate hit.

60m? Every Playstation will surpass that and even XB1 has a good shot at outselling it.

Think, when this gen is over NES could be down to the 8th highest selling home console of all time, and given this was Nintendo's highest selling console up until Wii ....

40m - 65m is a moderate hit, it's Playstation 1, 2 and 3, Xbox 360 and Wii all selling over 90m that are big.

smh it's funny Sony sells  over 80,000,000 in video games but always seems to lose billions every generation ...meanwhileNintendo every generation puts out a console that profits every generation....that is what the definition is as far as having a hit ......people also always seems to forget the money is in the software ...first party software ...why do you think you heard Sony say they want their first party to sell better that's where the profit is made (no middle man )....it's funny people forget that nintendo dominated the home and portable business for 8 years(2006-2013) and has has won 3 of the 7 generations ...smh at some people's meaning of success or hit ...I've been gaming since the 70s had almost every game system and currently owns all three