windbane said:
Gballzack said:
windbane said:
@gballzack: Let me try a step by step for you. 1. You said blu-ray required 1/3rd (made up stat) redundant data on the disc. 2. The only reason for that would be to help load times. 3. #2 means you were talking about load times. 4. Oblivion shows that when using the hard drive the load times can be twice as fast on the PS3. 5. Load times are slower for DL-DVDs when compared to blu-ray. 6. You continue to ignore #5 because you are trying to act like you were not referring to load times. 7. Blu-ray does not need redundant data as much as you claim because of fact #4 and fact #5. Got it? Edit: Please don't use curse words. Thanks. |
Windbane, Windbane, Windbane... I've already addressed all the points you've brought up and there are plenty of other people in this thread you haven't responded to yet, maybe you should try and follow up with your questionable claims against them instead of trying to troll me... Or are you trying to avoid having to put your money where your mouth is? This whole fiasco was your doing like most of the other drama in this thread, so please stop trying to blame others for your own wrong doing, its very rude. Funny how you started out yelling at me for something completely different in this thread and now are widdled down to trying to argue something else, kind of sad isn't it? At least your showing growth in your ability to keep topics in their own threads, I hope to see much improvement in you as you learn how to be civil around others. windbane said: Gballzack: "It is kind of sad Blu-Ray's size is virtually useless in that it has to be filled up with redundant data just to avoid terrible loading times. Is Sony banking on faster readers in the future to avoid this 'catch 22?'" Obviously, readers improve over time just like every optical media. However, the PS3 does not need to improve because on average it will be faster to load with the hard drive and blu-ray's constant read speed versus dvd 12x and the slower DL-dvd on the 12x drive. Microsoft can't increase the 360's read speed, and neither can Nintendo increase the Wii's. The PS3 will have the best read speeds. For your first sentence, refer to my above post. |
Now see Windbane, if you could have been civil like this to begin with then there would have been no need for all this drama. You really need to do something about your trolling tendencies. |
That quote by you was showing that you claimed the PS3 needed redundant data to improve the "terrible" loading times. You then went on to deny in 2 threads over and over that you were even talking about loading time. Obviously, you lied. I've shown several times now that you #1 make things up and #2 when you are proved wrong, ignore it. |
Windbane maybe you should try responding to the people who weren't just trying to politely ask a question. Why are you avoiding discussing issues with the other members of this thread? :)
windbane said:
Legend11 said:
You guys need to cool it before this thread gets locked as well. |
Is there a reason for that post? Is it the back and forth that annoys you, or what else about the thread should be locked? Try adding to the discussion and maybe it won't need to be locked, heh. |
Now lashing out at Legend who was only trying to warn us about our bickering? For shame. You really do have confrontational issues don't you?
