By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Burek said:
LudicrousSpeed said:

LOL I think he does it just for shtick now. It's funny to read someone contradict themselves so frequently and constantly shift goal posts.

Like that big list of crap he just posted about all the Microsoft games. And yet Sony has a list you can make just like that, only when they fund games or reach deals it's "expanding their catalog" and "forming partnerships" and "collaborations". And did you know that Naughty Dog was a D tier developer making only shit games until Sony bought them and showed them how to make good games? The more you know.

I understand the sarcasm...

But isn't it better to purchase a good developer that keeps on making good and great games, some of which are considered the best ever, than to purchase a good developer and turn it into a mediocre/pitiful studio producing motion control shovelware?


He was pointing out that I stated Sony is responsible for the rise of Naughty Dog because Sony totally changed their development process after they bought them. Sony is known for having Secondary teams which can help other teams develop and usually that is either Sony Japan or Sony Santamonica. Until Rare Microsoft had no team that was able to do multiple styles of games and even then they dropped the ball. They cant use the excuse that the owners left either because the owners of Naughty Dog left as well and Naughty Dog continues to get bigger and bigger.