Scisca said:
outlawauron said:
Iceland is close to nothing. That's why it was chosen, because it's lack of proximity to everything else. Some of the EU countries weren't chosen because there were other ones close by. Hawaii and Alaska were picked because they're so far away from everything else.
|
Ok, still does every single tiny Skandinavian country need a Panopticon? Wouldn't 2 suffice? These 5 countries have 26 mil people in total, while a whole ethnic group many (5 or 6) times larger gets nothing. Whole Central Europe got nothing, all European Slavs got outright ignored. This really is outrageous and can't be excused. Seriously, Warsaw and Budapest should be on the list and there can be no excuses about not including them. At least I won't accept any.
|
I don't disagree with you. I think one or both should have been on the list.
Brazil doesn't need two. Senegal and Kenya are both very questionable. Hawaii and Alaska should have been traded for Atlanta or Boston. Edmonton should have been traded for Vancouver.