By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
prinz_valium said:
Aphelion said:
prinz_valium said:


generally, yes. but not necessary 50%

and i dont see, why the xbox one should not

 

it still has the best third party support, big exclusive games coming and future pricecuts to happen

Well yahh no reason why you wouldnt.  Your xbox favoritism is really passed any sense of logic.


rofl. no! it passes any sense of logic to NOT expect yoy growth for the second year of ANY console.

even the wiiu did that

 

now pls stop that fanboy talk bullshit


I think he read your post as normally it's around 50% but could be less, but in X1 case it will be 50% because they have the best 3rd party support (which he may think is untrue and seeing most MP better on PS4 and 3rd better in X1 only when they pay for exclusivity, and even so having less games in total) he assumed you were being fanboy (which you assumed) but you are smarter and more open than most. You preffer MS, you bias in favour of them, but you don't deny reality. You are like reality would be PS4 selling 18M and X1 8M by the end of 2014 but some time ago you would predict PS4 15M and X1 10M (you know PS4 would sell quite better, but still gave more props to MS and that is fine)... I don't see you as a "toxic" fanboy or anything like that... he exagerated.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."