Welfare said:
http://www.amazon.com/best-sellers-video-games/zgbs/videogames (Hourly Charts) http://www.amazon.com/gp/bestsellers/2014/videogames/ref=zg_bs_tab_t_bsar#5 (Top 100 for 2014) http://www.amazon.com/gp/bestsellers/2014-10/videogames/ref=zg_bs_tab_t_bsar#2 (So far in October) http://www.amazon.com/gp/bestsellers/2014-09/videogames/ref=zg_bs_tab_t_bsar#3 (September) http://www.gamestop.com/browse/games?nav=28-xu0,135-ffff2418 (Gamestop) You would have to be a fool to think it WON'T light the charts on fire. |
im sorry but what does that prove exactly? Its just a placement on a chart. It doesnt give us any numbers. So the links dont really prove anything otherwise. Matter of fact its still lower than COD which is what VGchartz has. Now we can dispute the numbers but you dont have any of your own to prove that VGChartz numbers are wrong.