| Scisca said:
"Generations in technology" are defined exactly like that. iPhones and iPads are being compared non-stop to Samsung/Sony phones and have to be kept on the cutting edge. Something Wii U isn't doing. Nokia went Nintendo way when Apple entered the market, they were just releasing better phones than earlier, but not on par with Apple and what was the result? Were these phones, which weren't even smartphones, being considered "next gen" at that time? Hell no! Wii U is next gen for Nintendo. It's not a proper next gen for the whole world. Is it really so hard for you to understand? Because the whole world gets it quite clearly, as the sales prove.
|
I'm not even ignoring what you wrote. I just ignore what is wrong, and you are very delusional when it comes to technology. iPads and iPhones are compared on features not generations. I suggest you go have a proper look at what a generation is even by definition. You are so narrow minded that it is hilarious. I know Nintendo isn't in a vaccum, but it still doesn't make your argument of "needing a proper next gen console" valid.
It is a proper next-gen console whether you want to agree with it or not. Many developers agree with this. You don't need to be a clone to be next gen. A 2014 honda can still sell sitting next to a 2014 Corvette.







