By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
S.T.A.G.E. on 15 October 2014
Edit Thread
LudicrousSpeed said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:

Sounds like something MS would do. When Sony was behind on multiplats PC games weren't being held back until halfway through the gen when consoles were struggling badly. This politics seems to be primarily coming from MS and even Machinima was warning people of politics to gimp PS4 versions of games by MS because they were behind.

Sure, by "consoles makers" I am assuming he is referring to Microsoft and maybe Nintendo. I mean, I am sure Nintendo would hate to have vastly superior versions of Ubisoft Wii U titles on PC. Titles like Watch Dogs and um.. Ass Creed 5? No? The Division? No again? Rainbow Six? Shit. The Crew? Really? What about Trials Fusion? Fuck. What about that last gen Ass Creed game, Rogue? omg. FAR CRY 4! Fuck!

Ok, Nintendo just really doesn't want a vastly superior version of that Watch Dogs game on PC, even though it's already out on PC in vastly superior form, and people have pretty much forgotten about the game already, and it's not even out on Wii U yet.

Yeah, that's the other manufacturer they are referring to. Or maybe Sega? DREAMCAST 2 CONFIRMED?//?

"he implied that MS is making them lock the framerate on PC too".

Well I think he was trying to keep the name anonymous but blurted it out later on. Last gen Sony didn't cause PC versions of games to be dumbed down. and 360 multiplats didnt get dumbed down on account of Sony. 

Haven't you noticed that half the reason why this pairty issue is such a big deal is because MS has been fighting it themselves? Even after the Diablo incident where MS had to step in and help, they know its hurting their PR.