Currently Online 
| darkknightkryta said: As far as Sony did nothing to turn it around? That's a bunch of horse shit. Think getting Call of Duty, Assassin's Creed and Borderlands on the Vita was cheap? They ported very well received PS2 games there. PS3 Cross play titles. They created titles from the ground up, titles which were more costly than the rehashes Nintendo threw together for the 3DS. Hell higher selling 3DS titles were nothing but sequels (The rehashes). |
So you're accusing Nintendo of giving the 3DS rehashes, yet you said Sony ported PS2 titles to the Vita (the very definiton of a rehash). And you say the highest selling 3DS titles are nothing but sequels, but conveniently missed the table of the top selling Vita titles in the first post. Every one of them is at least the third or fourth entry in the series. Sequels sell, and every publisher knows that. If Sony or MS had Nintendo's cache of first party IPs, you best believe they would be cranking out Marios, Zeldas and Pokemons left and right too.
And this statement, "I'll also be so bold to say that Sony put more into the Vita than Nintendo put into the 3DS," is just laughable. You had just said in the statement preceding it that you wouldn't be surprised if Sony invested half a billion dollars into it to never see a return. If that's the case, why would it keep supporting the Vita? Answer: it's mostly not, and even the most passionate Sony/Vita fans I see on the Internet aren't denying that, except you.
You can make a point without turning it into a flame war.
