By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
curl-6 said:
o_O.Q said:
curl-6 said:

Ad hominem is an attack. What I said was not an attack, it was advice.

Your response have become so deeply paranoid that there is clearly no reasoning with you.


no reasoning?

you were the person that stopped reasoning with me look back at the posts

i asked youto post an example of an important leak and you promptly regurgutated a previous point you had made

you refused to carry to our discussion at that point so i poked a little fun at you

it makes me wonder though why what i said disturbed you so deeply

its like i could sit here and make up some bs about aliens crashing in the 1940s and the government reverse engineering their own spacecraft from them and you wouldn't be able to realise that i'm messing with you

You asked for an example, I gave you two, you proceeded to weave a web of paranoia so out of touch with reason that it became obvious that any attempt to talk sense into you is fruitless as you'll just fall back on "anything that contradicts my fantasy is part of the conspiracy". You need medical help that I'm not qualified to give.


"

can you be more specific?

People make mistakes. The more people involved, the higher frequency of mistakes. Add in hacking, digital espionage, etc and you have an environment where a secret society controlling the globe becomes astronomically improbable."

 

really? you gave no example all you did was continue to parrot something completely unrelated to what i asked

which is ironic because here i was asking you to post contradictory evidence which you refused to do

you could learn a lot from my boy sundin