Nintendo Illuminati Confirmed

[o_O.Q]

crissindahouse said:

o_O.Q said:

Kerotan said:

oh my mind is very open. it's open enough to know that the US govt couldn't keep a lid on a fucking tin of beans! building 7 was destroyed because it got pummuled to bits while the towers were falling down. You act as if they were made of match sticks and shouldn't of had an effect on the buildings they fell on. And yes large parts of at least one tower fell onto it. 

There is a world order but it's no secret like people want to believe. The real world order are the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer. That's gone on for as long as civilisations were advanced. It's not secret cult it's just a sad product of human nature. The rich will always look out for each other and try ensure things stay the way they are. 

"building 7 was destroyed because it got pummuled to bits while the towers were falling down"

please watch the video again... its quite clear that is not what happened

the video shows the building from various angles and at no point does it show bits from the other buildings falling on it

the building is just whole once second with no apparent damage, then the next it just collapses in on itself

watch it again do not fall for confirmation bias

allow yourself to reach any conclusion not just the predetermined conclusion you've been told you must have

Whatever the reason was on that day (which is hard to tell for anyone who wasn't there as expert), it was surely not "some people placed bombs there" or "some people destroyed the steal beams the weeks before"

I mean, let's be honest here, if there would have been some other people responsible for what happened on that day they wouldn't have any reason to destroy some other buildings around the twin towers. Not only doesn't it make any sense to destroy the twin towers and "just for fun" some other stuff around them as well but every extra action in every single building would increase the chance that someone will recognize it and risk to destroy the whole plan. You would also need more people which would increase the chance that someone will speak about it after some years.

Same with "there was no moon landing" which is total bullshit considering the situation between USA and Soviet Russia back then and how Soviet Russia simply accepted it as much as I know. Only reason why they would do that is because they knew it was true. 

"I mean, let's be honest here, if there would have been some other people responsible for what happened on that day they wouldn't have any reason to destroy some other buildings around the twin towers. Not only doesn't it make any sense to destroy the twin towers and "just for fun" some other stuff around them as well but every extra action in every single building would increase the chance that someone will recognize it and risk to destroy the whole plan."

 

you're doing the same thing sundini was doing assuming that you know what is logical about this situation

assuming that the people who did this had no reason to destroy the other buildings also

why assume that whoever did this did not have a motive for taking down all of the buildings?

and that's why i wasn't arguing that i knew the motive in its entirety for certain i mean we all know that part of the motive was iraq and the middle east but that may not have been the only thing

 

all i've been saying is that things don't add up here and that there is a variety of evidence that points to a controlled event