By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Eddie_Raja said:
GamechaserBE said:
IIIIITHE1IIIII said:

"The whole resolution and fps bullshit debate is to stupid for words. . ."

Well put. Now if only you would heed those words yourself, we might just make progress.

-

At the end of the day, no one remembers Ocarina of Time for its 320 x 240 resolution, or its 20 frames per second. They remember it because they got to own a horse, solve puzzles in cleverly designed dungeons, interact with people wearing masks, play songs to find secrets, and take down the king of evil and watch as his tower collapses.

That's how you make your games memorable.

Well they are victims of the Marketing, it is kind of sad that those people can't comprehend themself,  the same who say PS2 is their favourite PS console (and who was kind of weak compared to GC/Xbox) are so wild and sometimes hatefull in resolution debates...  Sony did a good job in marketing sucks for us gamers though..


Not to get off subject here but the PS2 was 1.5+ years older than both the Xbox and GC.  So yeah it should have been kinda weaker.  The sad fact was that it was still powerfull enough to stand up to both, and only the Xbox ever gave it a run for its money.

the timeframe is not important because someone will state that the timeframe between Xbox 360/ps3 launch in europe was also 1,5 years...The point is that marketing and executives let fanboys have heavy discussions for nothing and things they don't know about.. Is it cloud technology/Need kinect work or this game is only possible on PS3 bullshit people fight and defend it....