Xbox Honcho Phil Spencer Wants to Rethink the Parity Clause; Acknowledges Gamers’ High Expectations

[Muffin31190]

endimion said:

Muffin31190 said:

true_fan said:

Keep the parity clause, 97% of indies are garbage anyway and MSFT makes sure the better can pass through the process. There hasn't been one great indie game that has came for ps4 and skipped XB1 and Spencer has already confirmed his interest in popular games like No Man's Sky, unless sony ends u buying exclusivity. Also I wouldn't want to keep waiting for devs to develop XB1 version after the ps4 version.

Not to mention people focus on the games coming out at the same time, but people never mention the free devkits and other benefits of the id@xbox program,

You are right ... there has been way more then 1

Dust: an Elysian Tail 
Olli Olli 
Hotline Miami
War thunder 
Transistor
Towerfall Ascension
Resogun
Trine 2
Anomly 2
Awesomenauts
Velocity 2x
Sound Shapes

Now just because you might not consider these games to be great, does not mean  they aren't.
And you really want to keep something (Parity Clause) that will keep you from playing games becuase they were on a another system first?

not sure about the others but dust an elisian tail came out on 360... I know if finished it...

anyway where I agree is most of the big indies that are potential money makers get through the parity clause..... It's really a false issues when it comes to big indie titles... For the smaller no name studios that's an other issues and for gamers too

I can see what you mean for the larger studios.

But with the games he said XBone not 360