By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
flagstaad said:
Aielyn said:

Well, unless Ubisoft try to convince me to take an interest in the game again by actually making some sort of effort, I'm not going to buy it. I'm not asking for a lot - something in the game that justifies the six month delay, a decent trailer showing off the "extra", and perhaps a lower initial price for the game. So far they haven't even done a trailer.

There was nothing added, the extra time was used only to complete the game as development was stopped for 5 months, from January 2014 till June 2014. Only thing different is Gamepad support as both, remote play and as an interactive map of the city (not sure how much interactive)

They claim that they paused development in January, with the Wii U staff moving over to the other versions to get them done in time. Given that the Wii U version likely had the fewest people working on it, we're talking about just a few extra people working on the other versions. It might have saved them a month, two tops. Then they finished the other versions... wouldn't it have basically taken an extra two months to get the Wii U version done if they had all of the staff work on it from there?

But then, my point is that the CONSUMERS had to put up with a six month delay. I'm asking if WE are getting anything to make up for that. I don't give a shit about whether the delay itself was due to changes in arrangements for development, I care about Ubisoft's attitude towards their customers.