episteme on 05 October 2014
| bubblegamer said: If you give the first game a 10 already, you can't give the second any lower score when there are improvements. Unless you want to lose your credibility. I do wonder though why they're praising it for being a button masher? Isn't that the exact thing we hate about games in this genre!? |
We don't have the full quote for the context, but I think he meant that the most similar game in recent years (The Wonderful 101) had more complex controls with it's drawing techniques and they like that PG went back to button controls.
EDGE gave TW101 a 6/10 and wrote in the review: "You’ll soon wish for a simple selection menu or button shortcuts, and we quickly found ourselves defaulting to the easy-to-draw sword morph rather than experiment with our other options during battle."
lol, they missed the best part of the game, you can do insane combos the difficulty makes it very rewarding. Well, professional reviewers only have limtited time and I can understand that they couldn't practice dozens of hours to master the system.
