| Dark_Feanor said: Article that agree with your opinion and bias are always well written. There is basic nothing knew on that article that I couldn´t find in others reviews, even those that bash the game (Angry Joe). It´s clear that the game is adctive and made for exploit expansion packs and micro-transactions (?) in the future. I can see that in my Live friends feed. |
So, the first truly comprehensive review from someone who actually put time into the game instead of pushing it to the side after just a few hours....and it's now agreeing with biases? I'll throw you a bone:
Sure, it's well written because it agrees with my bias. But that's because the reviewer actually put time into the game (which is what your supposed to do) and did a review based on that. Instead of like the majority the reviews that came day 1 and only played a few hours in an unpopulated world meant to be "shared" and then said "well, this game sucks" (as someone pointed out, even Kotaku did that in an article "I only play Destiny for 45 minutes and it's boring").
Why don't you review, say, a Final Fantasy after only a few hours of play, before you get into the nitty gritty of the story, boss fights, fighting mechanics, etc. If that's all you base your review on, then yea, you'll think it sucks.
As crappy as it sounds, Destiny really "doesn't begin until you reach level 20". I just got there this weekend (maybe a few days before), and I've now been playing non stop. And you can all say it's "exploitative" but hey...nobody complains about Diablo.
