sundin13 said:
|
I agree and the agrument that it can't silightly irritiates me. 10/10 can't litrally mean perfect game because then it would be a measure of how few flaws a game has not a measure of how good a game is.
It's like saying a perfect circle is a 10/10 because it's perfect yet a picasso is a 2/10 because it's barly recogniasable as what it's supposed to be. Or copy of a twilight novel getting a better score than a copy of 1984 because that copy of 1984 has a few typos.
You can only decribe 10/10 as meaning perfect in the colloquial sence of describing something that's extreamly good. Otherwise it simply doesn't make sense.








)