By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
kupomogli on 17 September 2014
Edit Thread
Jranation said:
kupomogli said:

Even at 73 it goes to show how biased this industries journalists are. Despite being what's essentially the exact same game, add a Nintendo first party to the title and it's got a higher score than every traditional Dynasty Warriors released since the fourth one back in 2003. Hyrule Warriors actually scored higher than every Gundam Warriors, Ken's Rage, Samurai Warriors(tied with the first,) Warrior's Orochi, and One Piece Pirate Warriors.

Hey it's a Nintendo game. Let's review it, then add two more points to what it deserves! Journalism at its finest.

*edit*

It not only doesn't have online co op but has performance issues in local co op?  Yet journalists have no problem rating it higher than just about any Musou game released in the last 10 years.  Maybe I shouldn't complain and try to get it through to anyone.  It's not like a Nintendo fan would agree.  It's a Nintendo franchise afterall.


So.... How was the game?

What would you give it? Out of 10?

3/10 to Ken's Rage and that's the best Musou game.  Hyrule Warriors is less Ken's Rage style missions and more traditional Dynasty Warriors.  A shitty game with a face lift is still a shitty game.

See my PSN profile in the sig with the Hyaku Shiki?  I'm a Gundam fan and the Gundam Dynasty Warriors games are also garbage.  Doesn't matter what franchise it is, a coat of paint doesn't change its quality.