By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
impertinence said:
I'm slowly working by way through the thread again and I have noticed that Conegamer is extremely elusive and non-committal. A lot of his contributions are in the form of "That's a good observation", "Nice find, I'll have to keep an eye on that" etc. Also, when the chips were down at the end of the day he expressed he preferred the 'safest' lynch in Nickles but never actually put his money where his mouth is and instead kept his vote on ericFabian, which was pretty much a null vote, without having to be one of the people who didn't vote at all.

This combined with the well documented reluctance to contribute anything (despite making many promises) until pushed hard about it with votes going on him paints a pattern of someone who is trying as hard as possible to blend in and not stand out in any way.

FoS for Conegamer

For the bolded part; I didn't vote for Nickles for the reasons which I provided before. Here it is again, though.

I would much rather take the risk lynching Astro rather than causing a tie and thus both surviving. That's just how I saw it at the time, and I still believe it's the right decision even if Astro was to be town. It was worth the risk, quite simply.

Also my lack of contribution on the first day was due to being AFK for much of the week and using the site on mobile is near impossible for long posts such as this. That's not so much of a problem now.



 

Here lies the dearly departed Nintendomination Thread.