By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
fatslob-:O said:
Aura7541 said:

I'm not. In actuality, you are not reading carefully enough. You inadvertently contradicted yourself in a very entertaining fashion and now telling me to deal with it when I already did. The bolded is wrong, too. That's your opinion, not a fact. The only fact this that multiconsole owners aren't the majority. However, I'm a Nintendo gamer that is interested in other platforms and there are many others who are, too. Minority =/= Negligable

Keep using your anecdotes to suit your views.

I on the otherhand will adhere to data and until you provide evidence saying otherwise the result will stay the same. The chances of owning a console every generation is already low as it is. Let alone owning multiple consoles in that same generation ... 

You only proved that the majority of gamers are not multiconsole owners. However, that does not prove that Nintendo gamers are not interested in playing games from other systems. You have provided no evidence to that. You only made an interpretation of the data that was available to you. Here's the question that you asked a while ago: Where's YOUR claim that a lot of gamers do own multiple consoles in the same generation ?  You were asking me to prove that a lot, not the majority, of gamers own multiple consoles in the same generation. While I have anecdotes such as myself and a friend of mine who plays the Wii U as his main while also playing on Xbox platforms, it's much better than what you have displayed, which is nothing. Too bad your data can't prove that there isn't a lot of mutliconsole owners despite them being the minority. Repeatedly saying, "Nuh uh" won't magically make your argument correct.

Also, stop and look at where you are relative to your original argument...... You're goddamn far from where you originally started. You were way too invested in dissenting that you literally forgot what you were actually arguing in the first place. I even pointed it out to you, but you kept going the opposite direction! O.O This wouldn't have happened had you synthesized your conclusion from evidence instead of making the conclusion first and then, scavenging for "evidence" that fits your argument. Anyways, you have veered off way too much, so I'm going to stop here before you inadvertently jump to another topic. Good day