| flagstaad said: That is not a reasonable bussiness decision, when they released a game at the same time as on the other consoles, said title only sold 5% of what the others did, what reason did they had to keep working on the Wii U version and sacrifice more than 90% of the sales just to satisfy an audience that has proven them time and again that they really don't care. You say now that the game will sell only 100k, but if the release was simultaneous it would have sold maybe 200k tops, and as a bussiness man, there is no logic behind getting 100k more sales by sacrificing millions in May. Without the help of the splitted team the other versions would not have been ready by May, and there is a reason why all the consoles get a drought on summer, people buy less games and consoles, all publishers know and try to place their releases before it (en of may start of June) or after it (september), it is even worse to delay all the versions to a summer release. |
You're saying they could have sold 100k more for no additional expense, but doing so would be a BAD business decision? I can't take you seriously, that just makes no sense. And I didn't say a simultaneous release, you obviously didn't read my posts. I said a summer release, well after Mario Kart, during the Wii U game drought. It would have sold near PS3/360 version sales.
