By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
outlawauron said:
Chubomik said:
Brotherstotheend said:
it´s funny that some people here say that third-party games suck and are not good enough for nitendo players, but as soon as nitendo moneyhats a third-party game it´s goty before it´s release


How many times does this have to be said? Let me spell it out for you...

THIS GAME WOULD NOT EXIST WITHOUT NINTENDO

Every other publisher flipped Platiunum the bird, but when they pitched it to Nintendo, they got the OK. Nintendo did not pay for Bayonetta 2 to not come out on other systems. They were the only ones who wanted it to come out at all. Know what moneyhatting is before you post.

While I do agree that the OP is being a bit too optimistic, I think they're the only one claiming its GOTY material.

Publishing a game to only appear on your platform is no different than the term moneyhat. All that phrase means a console manufacturer paying for a game to appear solely on their platform.

Would you call Bloodborne, The Last Story, or Lost Odyssey moneyhats? That's more or less the same thing, except that the Bayo IP was pre-existing.



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.