torok said:
These shooter dudes can be actually massively skilled at that games. I usually am more varied in gameing genres, so sometimes I will meet guys at Killzone or BF that will simply obliterate me because they are pretty dedicated to that game. It's like a choice: being pretty good at one game or being decently good at several. About casuals vs dudebros in games, I've being doing some user tests with games for a project and I have to disagree. Casuals are terrible, terrible players. They can't get the simplest concepts of using a controller. Just having experience with a game controller (like a dudebro), already puts you in another level. A dudebro would beat a casual on almost all games and probably obliterate them in shooters. |
You do understand we've been using the term "casuals" years before cell phones were even a thing. Perhaps you disagree because you are a dudebro? Not saying you are but it would make sense. Especially since you are so wrong about the terminilogy and think that dudebros have any skill when they don't and that they are better than "casuals" When they absolutly arn't They are often terrible at most games and have a tiny amount of succes in dudebro shooters.(which for the record was used for years to describe gamers that would play a viariety of genres and never really play competitivly, was used to mostly describe nintendo players). That's why they spend most of the time playing multiplayer and ignore single player most of the time. Becuase they are terrible at it.
http://www.youtube.com/v/AoOOpLpcF28 http://www.youtube.com/v/CphFZGH5030
All Hail the Jester King. The King is back, and I am still a dirty girl prof ;)