| JazzB1987 said: Tbh review scores are complete bullshit. How can a 60fps version of the last of us have the same score as the sometimes 18fps version of TheLastOfUs on PS3? Or how can Skyrim have such a good score on PS3? |
I agree reviewer is useless in general... they give the score they want to give (probably a how much I liked the game) and them try to justify it. No more we have scores really atributed to aspects of the game... but even if we had and let's say Castlevania got 5 categories one of them being framerate if the game got 100% from 4 categories and 15% for framerate (giving a average of 83%) the game in fact should have a 50% final because it was so broken in one of the aspects.
TLOU having 95 probably get in their way for giving TLOUR scores... we can't take points for "being a remake'' because there isn't that score in the system, but if we really consider the double framerate (well quite more in some sections), double resolution we would all have to give 100% so that would be bad for us...
And I agree Skyrim is bad (even more on PS3).

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







