| small44 said: Why casuals bough wii u to play just dance and now they would not buy them on wii u. Activision is not first party so why you blame Nintendo ,Isn't Splatoon a new IP and it's look very original but i doubt it will save wii u Do you think Nintendo pay Activision to have The voice game? For me Nintendo need to release a powerfull but innovative consoles so they can attract 3rd party and hardcore gamers without that i see any way to Nintendo to compete with Sony consoles. Having The voice is better then nothing |
Do casuals buy the Wii U just to play Just Dance? Or do they just get the game because it comes out?
Because Nintendo decides what is on their consoles. Splatoon could very well be a breakout success, even if it doesn't sell systems. I doubt people are lining up to get Wii U's for The Voice. The difference is one game leaves the Wii U with some integrity. The Voice isn't going to save the Wii U either.
I already addressed this, money band aid.
For me, Nintendo needs to offer games you can't find on the other systems that I don't know... GAMERS actually want. They have taken large steps already with Bayo 1 and 2, The Devil's Third, Hyrule Warriors, ect. But notice how easily gamers dismiss that and go back to "it's a system for casual games". This combined with the Ubisoft statement is pretty damaging to Nintendo.
Having The Voice is a HUGE step in the wrong direction of getting back into a competitive race with Sony and M$. It's even a HUGE step in the wrong direction to getting back in good with gamers. I understand it's about the money. It's a business, blah, blah, blah, but really what it means is a first step for Nintendo going into the next gen with the same stigma.
