binary solo said:
Yes, that could potentially form the basis of a claim or complaint that because of the internet the violating content is still out there and it continues to damage the value of the advertising deal. However it would probably be a bit of a test case and I'm not sure a court would find that it's MS's fault. The court may tell Acti to go an assert its trademark rights with each and every website that is displaying the ad as "news". gaming media sites can talk about they ad, but showing the actual ad even in a news context could be violating the trademark. |
Well MS could be found liable because they know the full consequence that could be involved in this stunt.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







