Nintendo's revenue will decrease if it goes third party.

[joesampson]

amak11 said:

Fusioncode said:

Yes you are. The topic is about Nintendo making more money as a 3rd party publisher than a console manufactorer. Sony isn't a 3rd party publisher as far as I'm aware. Whether you want to accept it or not, the fact is Nintendo has posted losses 2 years in a row. Considering they still posted a loss last quarter, they're likely going to post another loss for the year. Sony isn't doing well, nobody is disputing that, but it has nothing to do with Nintendo's current financial state.

Profit is not revenue, and we are talking about revenue in this thread. I injected it as a comparison, whether you are inclined to agree or disagree with my statement is entirely on you. Nintendo is not in the red. This is fact that you are not understanding. My prediction is they are not in the red and hopefulling making revenue. besides this thread is FOR FACT talking about whether Nintendo would make revenue (which is enough money to pay your expenses) if they are third party. They would not make any additional revenue meaning they would post considerably larger losses. The chances are at Nintendo's current employee number Nintendo would never  make profit on third party life. 

You're right, profit is not revenue, profit is what matters. Given that, I don't think you understand what "in the red" means which leads me to believe you may not understand the difference between profit and revenue or any other financial terms. I suggest you look up these terms in investopedia.