On MCC and remasters.

[Jazz2K]

Nicklesbe said:

Jazz2K said:

Yea that's true some devs lie about resolution a lot this gen and people eat it up just to realise they've been lied to. We shouldn't believe everything devs say, some are so angry that they sue devs because of this. I still don't understand though how you can "trust" IGN but not the other sites and the devs themselves... seems to me you chose to believe the worst case scenario. But in any case, don't go on spreading your p2p as if it was fact since you don't know either.

I'm not choosing to beleive anyone. You asked for my source before and I gave it to you. I've also said time and time again that I won't know for sure until I actualy play it. If anything I am distrusting both of them equally because history they both should be distrusted equally. I am simply looking at the facts for what they are and acknowledging that at this point either possibility is viable.

"Most of the remasters has dedicated servers for their multiplayer while MCC keeps true to the old halo games and keeps p2p connections and needing to connect to a host to play multiplayer. That's really the only difference between them."

That is what is keeping this discussion going on. Even IGN's say is not really clear while every other site has dedicated servers for multiplayer. MS stated they had invested a lot to ensure every games get dedicated servers, no MS games uses p2p on X1 yet you find one source that says otherwise say it's the only difference between remasters lol. Dude, you could've search a little more but yes you chose to stick to that one for a reason.