On MCC and remasters.

[Jizz_Beard_thePirate]

You serious with WWHD? You do know wind waker is almost 2 years older then halo 2 right? It might look like a bigger improvement, but thats due to halo being a realistic game, so with better power the game is easyer to see the improovements. Unlike wind waker wich is meant to look cartoony, but even so, you can really see the improovements. The caracters you can see a boost, but the scenary is almost a diferent world.

Here you can see so pics of it before and 

 

That is excelent for them, but what does that have to do with my statement? Nothing. He clearly tried to downplay the WWHD in wich I showed that probably more work went into it then the MMC. Its harder to upgrade a game that its meant to look cartoony and keep the same look and feel, while for realistic games is almost a click of a button on the pc.

First of all... I am not trying to downplay wwhd. All I am saying is that comparatively, MCC has more work put into it then both tlou and wwhd. I played wwhd and if you have ever seen my posts about it around the site, all I have done is nothing but praise how beautiful the graphics look but that still doesn't stop the fact that MCC has a lot more effort put into the upgrade then wwhd will and it clearly shows it. And I m not sure what does it being older have to do with anything cause I never said it wasn't a great remaster... I am just saying that MCC has a lot more work put into it. Now sure, you can say it has a cartoony look hence why it doesn't need as much of an upgrade and I dont disagree but that doesn't stop the fact that MCC still has a bigger upgrade out of all the remasters this gen... That doesn't mean wwhd is a bad remaster by any means, it just means that MCC is a better one if you are only going by the level of improvements and nothing else