Jizz_Beard_thePirate said:
I am not expecting that level of difference from a one year old game but Sony could have chosen any other game to remaster and made look just as amazing in terms of noticable differences but no, instead, they chose a one year old game which is why it got some flack. I mean, its fine, I get it, not everyone has played it which is fine but that doesn't mean I am not gonna say how much more of a difference MCC has cause clearly, MS is putting a lot of work on their MCC and its showing it cause the level of difference in this looks amazing compared to the Last of Us or WWHD and MS really do deserve a lot of credit for it |
You serious with WWHD? You do know wind waker is almost 2 years older then halo 2 right? It might look like a bigger improvement, but thats due to halo being a realistic game, so with better power the game is easyer to see the improovements. Unlike wind waker wich is meant to look cartoony, but even so, you can really see the improovements. The caracters you can see a boost, but the scenary is almost a diferent world.
Here you can see so pics of it before and after. http://www.ign.com/wikis/the-legend-of-zelda-wind-waker/HD_Screenshot_Comparison
It takes genuine talent to see greatness in yourself despite your absence of genuine talent.







