On MCC and remasters.

[Jizz_Beard_thePirate]

Phronesis said:

Jizz_Beard_thePirate said:

I am not expecting that level of difference from a one year old game but Sony could have chosen any other game to remaster and made look just as amazing in terms of noticable differences but no, instead, they chose a one year old game which is why it got some flack. I mean, its fine, I get it, not everyone has played it which is fine but that doesn't mean I am not gonna say how much more of a difference MCC looks cause clearly, MS is putting a lot of work on their MCC and its showing it cause the level of difference in this looks amazing compared to the Last of Us or WWHD and MS really do deserve a lot of credit for it

Microsoft is putting a lot effort on MCC indeed and the game has GREAT value since it's a compilation of classics.
This has nothing in common with TLOU which was also a success, therefore justifying it's existence. 

I never said TLOU shouldn't exist and isn't a success and its great that it is. I am just saying MCC has a lot more effort put into it