Phronesis said:
How do you even expect the difference from TLOU to be so high if the game was released last year? It's not 2 decades of difference. There's no 'shame'. The game looks AMAZING. Obviously much better looking than the Halo 2 remastered since it's a more recent game.
I'm not saying that MCC won't be cool, my problem is how there's so much hate about TLOU remaster but Microsoft has a FREE PASS to remaster.
Let's not forget, TLOU remaster was a tremendous success and this debate it's old since daily there were topics saying how "Sony is being extorsive" but Microsoft "Oh yeah, these amazing games are back!".
Stop believing everybody played the game. Some came from 360 and wii and want to enjoy the game.
And as long as people tries to say that Sony is "this and that" but MS remaster it's ok... Then they are just being hyprocrite and are clearly in denial. Both are remaster, this is just a fact.
|
I am not expecting that level of difference from a one year old game but Sony could have chosen any other game to remaster and made look just as amazing in terms of noticable differences but no, instead, they chose a one year old game which is why it got some flack. I mean, its fine, I get it, not everyone has played it which is fine but that doesn't mean I am not gonna say how much more of a difference MCC has cause clearly, MS is putting a lot of work on their MCC and its showing it cause the level of difference in this looks amazing compared to the Last of Us or WWHD and MS really do deserve a lot of credit for it
