| ckmlb said: 1. How is it biased that I point this news????? What the hell is wrong with you? I can't post news of Nintendo getting sued? 2. How the hell is that thread flame bate? how? tell me, you can't have a positive thread about the PS3? 3. Did you see the actual sales of the game first week? 21,000 my prediction was even higher than that so what the fuck are you talking about? I said a minor hit as in it will sell well, better than it actually sold. 4. You said that it would be nice to have SC IV on Wii then said it was shit... Do you have a really short memory or something? 5. You make this claim with no basis, I guess for sure it will suck cause Conker sucked... 6. You have no proof whatsoever that it is an FPS you made the claim to troll saying PS3 and 360 are FPS consoles... 7. How can you claim both formats will lose when the question was which will win? For trolling purposes it works though... |
1. When did I say it was biased? I merely commented on you being the thread starter? Someone else brought up the issue of bias in commenting on you owning a Wii which you followed up with an attack on me. You made the first direct attack in that thread, not me. Again, another case where you're the instigator. *shakes head*
2. Funny how pro PS3 threads always manage to double as anti-everything else threads. Funny how every praise for the PS3 comes conveniently with a slame for the Wii or 360.
3. I merely made a passing comment, what value you chose to attribute to it was your own doing not mine.
4. I didn't say it would be shit, do you have a quote of me saying that? I merely said there was little to anticipate given the franchises track record. I would still like it to be on the Wii, but that doesn't mean it will sell well or be a great game. Was I wrong in saying the GC version of Soul Callibur II sold the best? Is it so wrong to look at something unbiasely.
5. No basis? Grabbed by the Ghoulies and Conkers were flops, that seems like pretty good basis to me. Again, I was not alone on this sentiment in the thread, stop trying to act like my post was something special there.
6. I never said I had any proof, I merely illustrated I was pretty sure it would be an FPS because of who was working on it, I don't know how you turn that into me attacking the PS360. Is it wrong to assume the man who is famous for Doom would be making another FPS for two consoles with strong FPS underbase?
7. Because it was within the topic of the thread. I don't see a rule anywhere on this forum that states in a thread which asks a question, you can only respond "yes or no".
A bit paranoid aren't we, why do you think everyone is out to get you? Again might I point out your dodging the issue in this thread we're currently in right now. Is all you can do is fall back on other threads to defend yourself?
