wilco said:
There isn't anything inherently wrong with doing it from the male perspective and having the male be the hero, the issue that some feminist have is how often the trope is overused. In isolation, I don't think there is anything wrong with what watch dogs did. |
But that's my point, there isnt anything inherently wrong with doing it. Sure perhaps people dont think its written well enough, but as the main character is a man and this is a subplot, there is nothing wrong with that...the whole game isnt about that one particular issue (I dont believe cause i havent played more than 1 hour of WD yet)...but yet it's the thing that is being focussed on.
The reason why most games have the male as the hero is two fold, firstly most people who buy AAA games are male, secondly female character leads dont on the whole sell as well. Now if that is the case, do we expect companies to invest $50m+ dollars on a game that is more inclusive for a small market and on a product which will sell less. They just wont. Of course they can do more to make games seem more interesting and better written, but that is a different argument...
On Anita..she is a woman that has an opinion, I dont necessarily agree, I do agree gaming still hasnt grown up or is able to necessarily write good stories, but I dont agree there is anything wrong with gaming. It's all down to a matter of taste in the end, and one persons opinion should not be in any way used as *this is the only right opinion*. Unfortunately for me, there is a bit to much positive descrimination right now, certainly in some elements of the press seem to be pushing with an agenda. It feels like a battle for control of what and how games get made, and on the terms of the gaming press, which is very scary indeed.
PS - I do agree that threats to someone's life for having an opinion is a total disgrace and should be stopped.








