| tbone51 said: If Nintendo was really being dirty then i would admit it but it aint true, as i pointed out in the post above. Same people to critisize MS+Sony? C'mon thats just a very few and its from all sides. I can admit when Nintendo is Wrong/being dirty, etc. And i try to be reasonable with other companis too.
Ex: I feel like Nintendo is one of the best with DLC, they make it so its definitely worth the purchase (looking at MK8), but unfortunately Mario Golf was definitely wrong and a rip off (at least to me) when it came to dlc. MS just recently did something dirty, though its not like anybody cares and its pricing the Kinect at $150. Of course this is an opinion shared all over the internet as i dont personally care. Sony awhile back had that psp go. Yes it might be different situation then nintendo HH, but it didn't allow you to play your retail games, right? PS Vita TV wont let you play some vita games as i recall. (though im looking to purchase one in the future).
I dont think Nintendo ripping people off, if many agreed then nobody would buy the N3ds, and clearly that would be untrue as we'll see in Oct this year (for the japanese). |
I'm not saying that Nintendo is being dirty. I'm saying that Sony and MS never released a new version of a console that would run games that the older versions wouldn't. Let's say I've bought a 3DS two weeks ago. Now, there is a new model that will have access to 3DS games that my newly acquired 3DS can't run.
PSP Go wasn't capable of running any game that the normal PSP could. Actually, it couldn't run games that were released only in physical media. PS Vita TV can't run any game that the normal Vita can't. Actually, it can't run game based on touch and some other features. I have a Vita and when vita TV launched I knew that my now almost 2 year old device can run any games that Vita TV can and more. In these two cases, the new model is actually limited compared to the older one.
