@the OP
... the best way to disprove another's theory, one which lies contrary to your own, is to prove yours conclusively, without question or ambiguity.
since that isn't a possibility for you, or anyone who believes as you do, your question of 'where did the big bang come from?' is purely combative and intentionally so, as you have nothing to substantiate your own, differing opinion.
the largest and most unavoidable distinction between those two schools of thought; the big bang and evolution vs creationism, is that only one of them has consistently moved forward with any type of explanation as to why we are here, while the other has relied on the same proof and support for millennia, that of simple belief.
you can believe in anything you like, but the reality of that belief, it's truth, has to reside in something more than just the belief itself, otherwise it's just an idea; and that is perfectly realized in the 'idea' of a god.
no one has the answers right now, on either side of the argument, but I am more comfortable with the explanations of an evolving science that strives to understand rather than accepting an explanation that has been conveniently subscribed for me, one that doesn't ask me to prove anything.. just accept and believe.
you're fully aware that, at present, no one can explain where the big bang came from, and you should honestly be ashamed of the childish nature and underlying insecurity of your own beliefs that force you to ask the question in the first place.
in other words, you should question why you asked.. and while you're at it, you should question some other things too.







