By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
BMaker11 on 28 August 2014
Edit Thread
RenCutypoison said:
BMaker11 said:
OmegaRed421 said:
BMaker11 said:

Wikipedia is as accurate as the Encyclopedia Brittanica. 


If that were true then why do professors never let you cite Wikipedia as a source? It is a good source but can be very inaccurate depending on the article.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4530930.stm

It is true. Professors just don't like it because it's a conglomeration of sources instead of being a primary or secondary source on it's own. But you know what you can do? Use the sources wiki uses. Professors will even tell you that

Fail on the source. Wiki source is on attackonthefanboy, wich source is insiderp. 120% hoax

Definitely not always reliable. Always check sources. And sources' sources.

Oh....in that case, I will admit defeat, as I was incorrect.

On the flip side, though, we know TLOU PS3 has sold 7M+ copies. VGC still has it at 4.87M. I doubt the remainder was all digital, retail, or a mix of both. I mean, there is a discrepancy of 2.13M+, so we know VGC has been undertracking this game. By a lot. And quite frankly.....Insiderp has been more accurate than VGC, lately. Coupled with it being the "fastest selling PS4 title" digitally and "dominating the charts" (for July) at retail when it was only on sale for 2 days in July (against a whole month of sales for other games), it doesn't make sense that it only sold 600K FW. Infamous: SS sold 700K FW. All that factored in (and a larger install base to boot), do you honestly think it only sold 600K FW?