Half naked

[Grey Acumen]

totalwar23 said:

Grey Acumen said:

lol, yeah, pretty much, but the internet is vast, and I'm sure there will be a few people that appreciate the mental effort.

though i can't help but point out that "mutilato" is confusing "logically" with "legally"

Well, the example he used is a case of legality but legality follows strict logic anyways. Anyways, he was right on the money. Declaring that something might exist because there's no evidence to support its nonexistant is a fallacy.

Except that's not true. First off, sayign that legality follows strict logic is like saying that Politicians all have the people's best interest at heart.

Second of all, if there's no evidence to the contrary, then it MIGHT exist. It doesn't prove that it DOES exist, merely that it CAN. What people forget so easily is that just because the opposing argument hasn't been proven true doesn't make you side of the argument true either.