X1 more competitive than Ps4

[DonFerrari]

teigaga said:

DonFerrari said:

teigaga said:

I' haven't taken the time to check so I'll take your word for it that those things that can be quantified are indeed fact. Im still not sure the PS4 has more retail releases which is what I specified, but as you pointed out my mental refering is going a few months back so is probably out of date... Anyways, i'm glad its moved away from a sales discussion, to a discussion on features which actually make somethig competitive, which is the whole point of the post-

P.S I think using Singstar is more laughable then Ori which looks gorgeous IMO.

Well the question was "most competitive" and that is the guy who is winning.

Its context sensitive, I personally think context here was clearly not that they are winning, but that on paper they have features which make them competitive compared to sony's features. Read the actual article for more clarification. Just some examples of what competitive means taken from the web.. The bolded is relevant to Xbox.

1.(Commerce) sufficiently low in price or high in quality to be successful against commercial rivals 

2.relating to or characterized by an urge to compete
3.well suited for competition: a competitive price. (exchange price for games, features, bundles)

I read the article and posted it after reading this is why I asked if he was spinning or trolling. Yes you can be price competitive (but to be "the most" you need to be cheaper, WiiU wins here), feature (but to be "the most" but they would have to work there), content (but to be "the most" you have more games 1st party WiiU win, all summed PS4 wins).

To be competitivein broad view you must be seem as valuable, but when you are the console selling the least you can't say you are the most competitive. The PR guy was trying to pass his opinion (of having the best product) as a fact they are most competitive. Read the article again.