MS told Blizzard 900p was "unacceptable" for Diablo 3 on Xbox One.

[eva01beserk]

QuintonMcLeod said:

eva01beserk said:I watched the video,saw your second video and seen many videos like it before. second build did not include windows so its actually more expensive. I never said it was not more powerfull, it definetly is. But to asume that just cuz of that it will be able to run 2 games at the same time is just crazzy. I know I cant change your mind but diablo is a demanding game, graphics alone is not what makes a game demandig, all the stuff going on and the amount of characters, particle efetcs, mobs, npcs and a lot of things make tthe game demanding. Even if the game was not demanding, runing 2 at thhe same time is insane and neither of thse builds will be able to run it.

 

As for Diablo 3's graphics. Here are the minimum PC requirements for the game:

Windows® XP/Vista/7 (latest service packs) with DX 9.0c
Intel Pentium® D 2.8 GHz or AMD Athlon™ 64 X2 4400+
NVIDIA® GeForce® 7800 GT or ATI Radeon™ X1950 Pro or better
1 GB RAM (XP), 1.5 GB (Vista/7)
12 GB available HD space
DVD-ROM (required for retail disc versions only)
Broadband** Internet connection
1024x748 minimum resolution

And if you're running the expansion, an additional gig of RAM. Just look at those requirements! The X1950 is equivelent to what's in the Xbox 360 - a card that's almost a decade old!, and you're saying Diablo 3 is a graphically demanding game? LOLOL!

And this is your issue. You're underestimating what a PC is capable of and overestimating what the PS4 can do.

Look at this video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=riYtP69Z2xQ

If people are able to play 4 player co-op of Left 4 Dead 2 using a single GPU that is equivlent to what's in the $500 dollar PC, why would PC gamers not be able to do the same with D3 today? I will admit the processor in the example is still a bit pricey, so allow me to give you another example:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gfqHRHpiC28

If they can run 3 games (one of which is an entirely different game!) on a single AMD 5570, why wouldn't they be able to do the same with Diablo 3? 

 

Look, man. The PC trumps the PS4, no matter which way you swing it. The PC version of Diablo 3 will obviously be the superior version, whether you like it or not. Those are facts. I'm sorry.

I have to admit that that was impresive.

But still, the cpu alone of the first one runing 4 games was as expensive as a ps4/xb1. 

On the second one I have to say that it might be possible to run 2 games of diablo 3. Maybe, not entirely convinced but sure it would not be max setting as the 3 games runing on the video you could of played them on a gamecube.

There is no way that cost $500, first it said it nowhere on the video and as I looked online for the components it said it had, that rig was at least $600. Second you would had to add the server device wich you showed me it was around $100.  Then the monitors wich I only looked on amzon and could not find anything cheaper then $130 for a 23" 1080p monitor so lets asume you get 3 at $390. Mouse and keyboard easy $15 for both, 3 of them would be $45. 

That adds up to $1035 asuming that it has windows installed, the one you said cost $500 did not havewindos wich is why it cost $500 with it it was around $600. But what ever. So for 2 people to play, it would be $$880, for 3 $1035 and for 4 $1190. Ands this still me beliving that rig ccant handle it and probably it can do 2 people with very unstable framerate. The ps4 is tested 4 people 1080p 60hz.

Do you still think is better economicly to play on the computer Diablo 3 then on the ps4, or even performance wise?