MS told Blizzard 900p was "unacceptable" for Diablo 3 on Xbox One.

[eva01beserk]

QuintonMcLeod said:

eva01beserk said:

Yes really. This rig is better then an xbox one no doubt, but the ps4 is really close to it in performance and $166 cheaper so its still the better choice. And the point you where making before about the split resourses, this rig wouldnot be able to maintaing to diferent games of diablo 3 runing simultaneisly on lan. So it is still much cheaper to get a ps4 to play local multiplayer and probably would deliber a better performance than a $1000 rig split resources to play local multyplayer.

I can tell you didn't watch the video. The rig in the video was able to run all the games (save two - ACIV is a very unoptimized game and runs like garbage even on high-end machines) at 1080p and 60 fps locked on high settings. These are settings well beyond what the PS4 is capable of doing. The PS4's performance isn't anywhere close to this. If you honestly believe it is, then you are lying to yourself. This rig can certainly run Diablo 3 in multiple instances (Diablo 3 isn't a demanding game by any stretch of the imagination). Considering you didn't know this lets me know that you honestly don't understand the PC.

Here's an even cheaper PC with a beefier GPU:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ECnV5kATo4E

 

I watched the video,saw your second video and seen many videos like it before. second build did not include windows so its actually more expensive. I never said it was not more powerfull, it definetly is. But to asume that just cuz of that it will be able to run 2 games at the same time is just crazzy. I know I cant change your mind but diablo is a demanding game, graphics alone is not what makes a game demandig, all the stuff going on and the amount of characters, particle efetcs, mobs, npcs and a lot of things make tthe game demanding. Even if the game was not demanding, runing 2 at thhe same time is insane and neither of thse builds will be able to run it.