Goatseye said:
$32 dollars a year for XBL ain't nothing to a G. Instead of buying the rights to matches from sports association for a fee, which would not be small, why not partner up with Sky or ESPN to offer sport matches exclusively to your subscribers? Which also, would allow me to party chat with a friend in New York, to watch the same game and trash talk while we both enjoy it. I don't think that's "nothing in return" to me. |
You're missing the point that XBL was entirely unnecessary for any of that. Before the policy reversal, you were still paying to use stuff you already paid for (in this case, your ESPN partnered ISP giving you lots of sports). Whoop-de-doo. The operating system actually works, so you can chat with your friends. But was XBL necessary to watch ESPN together? Nope.
Nothing in return. All those things you just needed an internet connection for, Xbox fans said it was ok to tack on another fee to use them. Did you know that Internet Explorer was behind XBL? As in, you pay for your internet, then you have to pay again to use it on Xbox. This is the issue that thismeintel brought up and that I expounded on. Xbox fans continuously support putting content behind paywalls, making your initial investments worth a whole lot less, and you get nothing in return for it. It's a slippery slope








