Help me debunk this racist

[Kaizar]

Aielyn said:

reggin_bolas said:

Okay guys, I went ahead and responded because you brought up so many good points such as the Mali Empire, that race is an arbitrary social construct, and many others.

Well, I'm basically paraphrasing but this is what he had to say in return.

He claims race is a valid scientific category even though it's inexact. That's because social sciences are considered inexact, they don't yield certainty like the hard sciences. He then proclaimed that if people have lived in isolated environments sharing a similar gene pool under similar environments, how can the end result not be distinct categorical races based on genetics? The recent comingling of people due to globalism is a recent phenomenon which undoubtedly would polute the concept itself.

Genetics isn't part of the "social sciences". Basically, your racist has contradicted himself, by asserting that this is somehow something inherent to being black, and then asserting that race falls within the social sciences.

Actually when you look into the history of every time a ethnicity visit another, you will see that Caucasian people have always stick out personality wise, for instance they were the only race perceive by any & all other races of people as the "people with no soul" (Hawaiians called them this) and fork tongue people/the white man (nationalize Americans called them this) and white devils (people of Africa called them this) and blue eye people (Persians say this) and gagi (not sure if I spelled it right, but the Japanese called them this) and round eye people (the chinese say this) and white supremacist (today's South Koreans say this). Anyways, throughout history you only see the Caucasian race recieve all these negative intrepertations by the very people they visited, because of a unique social way that only white people act like these past somethhing like 1,000 years or hopefully much less.