Mad55 on 16 August 2014
Scoobes said:
The article wasn't saying that and most people on this thread haven't said that (although many have commented on MS' lack of quality first party output). It simply pointed out that money being spent on securing a "timed" exclusive from a third party has numerous caveats including negative PR and the simple fact that the money could be spent on funding internal development of another title which MS would be able to wholly own and control. |
Microsoft have a lot of first party studios. Maybe they arent using all of them right, but they have plenty. In general the article could be aplied to sony or Nintendo as well as they have done the exact same thing.
