By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Teeqoz on 15 August 2014
Edit Thread
prinz_valium said:
Teeqoz said:
prinz_valium said:

sure. if u want to sell or generate profit, u have to invest money

and building up new studios and/or ips, take years of development and huge rsiks.
that would not benefit ms right now


neither did this practice benefit ALL gamers.
it just benefits the games who are on the right side... (or on both)

 

 

so good as a business practice

but bad, if u want to judge it by moral aspects


It doesn't benefit anyone. Xbox One gamers were getting the game rgeardless, but MS paid so that PS and PC gamers wont get it (whether it's timed or not, I really don't know anymore).

it's not better for anyone, it's just bad for someone.


so it doenst benefit ms, that some tr fans would buy an xbox so they can play that game?

i doesnt benefit ms if they sell more units of software because of that times exclusive deal and get more roayalties?

and i doenst benefit if ms adds value to theire console compared to its competitors?

if both have the game, it would be a tie. in this case u get "more"

 

as example. u have 100 buck. every one else has 100, too.

every one exept u has to give away 50.

u dont have more money after that, but ur the ritchest guy now. does it benift u or not, regardless u would have that 100 bucks anyway?

ofc it does. just not in a "good" way.


You said "it doesn't benefit ALL gamers . It just benefits the gamers that are on the right side (or both)." Your post clearly says it's beneficial for some gamers, when in reality, it doesn't give anything to xbox owners, it only takes things away from PS owners.