Wright said:
BMaker11 said:
Hell no. Post-game DLC that actually adds to the game, yea, I'm fine with. Because it is actually "additional content" (like Left Behind for TLOU, Broken Steel for Fallout 3, or The Signal/The Writer for Alan Wake or maybe additional songs in Guitar Hero/Rock Band). But maps packs that I can only believe are purposefully omitted from the game (I mean...they advertise them before the game is even released) or content that is actually on the disc that you have to pay to get access to (fuck you Capcom), that can go straight to hell.
|
I know that Capcom has made some pretty bad moves, especially with locked on-disc content that is later sold as DLC, but in their defense, I'd like to say that they also created one of the best post-game DLC of the seventh gen, Dark Arisen.
|
I only targeted Capcom with that comment because they were the most notable perpetrators for that type of DLC because they did it multiple times (UMvC3, SFxT [the big one], RE5/6/Raccoon City, and a few others if I'm not mistaken), . Yoda/Vader were also locked in SCIV, but that's not as egregious as locking away like 10 or 12 characters and making you pay for them.
Dark Arisen is great, as it's not the above type of DLC (although I think Dragon's Dogma had some on-disc DLC as well, but not something that expanded the game much). That, I have no problems with.
