By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Soriku said:
Mr_No said:

While I'm open minded to different arguments and I think about them, it doesn't mean I have to immediately take them as the absolute truth. I'm not refuting science or being ignorant. By open minded, I mean I'm not a bible thumper that think the Bible is the only truthful source of information. I don't believe that the Earth was made 6,000 years ago. I do see the scriptures as a loose interpretation. I don't have to see the scriptures as anyone else does. So you think it's a bad thing that I firmly stand by what I believe? Because it's never bad when atheists fully refutes others beliefs, is it? And I know you didn't mean the above as an offense.


There are no good external references pointing to the fact that the Bible or any other religious scripture is true. It's all taken on faith, which I don't agree with, so that's why I don't like it. Not that it should matter to you whether I do or not though.

Atheists at least have a strong basis for refuting religious beliefs. Faith just can't do that with atheist arguments. So that's why I have no issue with atheists refuting religious beliefs (you don't have to be insulting to make a case against religion either). It's what makes sense to me.

I do know the scriptures are based on faith. And you don't have to like or agree with it, and I really don't mind if you do or don't. Catholicism is my way of life, and I don't see it as black or white. I have no issues with atheists making their point, but like I mentioned on my first post, I strongly dislike when certain people have to resort to insults, and in my opinion, that makes the offenders look as bad as the bible thumpers. I reiterate that I'm a firm believer, but I'm not closeminded.