padib said:
Sparks, I really don't understand your reasoning on outlaw here. 1) The link you referred to has outlaw simply stating that he doesn't know the answer to your question, I'm not sure what's so scummy about that. 2) I also don't understand how you get that no mafia daytalk is so much of a given to him from that related post? Also, you replied to his defense by saying that the rules never stated either, but outlaw never took position and said he considered that he was not sure if he understood the rules right. |
1. The post from the link was only there to provide context for the paragraph that followed.
2. He knew about daytalk, and said he got it from the rules, even though it was not stated in the rules.
Regarding my reasoning: Take two separate races, one grows hair on their head, and the other doesn't. I'm not wearing a hat on my head. I ask the bald people what's on my head, they go "hair, duh". Ask the other group, they go "I'm not sure, it'd be impossible to tell without a microscope". They give different answers based on assumptions (what things that are a given).
fyi, I tried rephrasing the question @outlaw numerous times cuz I really wanted an answer.
I also thought Nickles had the same problem earlier as well, but I checked again and it was cool. See last quote from this post of mine.
Besides all that, a big part of my vote for outlaw was just cuz I didn't wanna see prof go so soon.
