Conegamer said:
That is fine, you raise some good points. At any rate, may as well make my vote now and explain a little now with a more in-depth explanation tomorrow or later today. I vote Outlawauron.
Why? A few reasons. It is mainly due to the responses in the thread of which he has made thus far. First let's have a look at Smeags' and now also TheProf's comparisons (there's more from both of these users, but you get the idea). Both of them reflect the same thing; Outlaw is the only person whose contributions appear to have gone backwards as time went by. Now, that's unusual because more and more accusations have been thrown out and things have got more serious, so a lack of discussion and content appears to me to be an evasive move. Then you have comments like this one, where he effectively tries to find a reason to not respond to questions which is something that doesn't make sense to me. Indeed, as time went on his opinion and his contributions seemed to boil down further to a point where they were unrelated to the game, as he seemed to almost fall behind a false persona thereafter and make more general comments. To me, this strikes as a man who is trying to remain in the shadows and banking on an earlier flurry of activity (which upon reflection seems rather canned and pre-planned, as others picked up on sooner but my lack of experience took longer to pick up on) to protect himself when we get to the serious part of the day. Again, this reflects back to what was mentioned before. Wright still unnerves me somewhat. But, I've spoken to him enough on and off the site to know that this is just his style, at least that's what I'm thinking for now. It's why I wanted to wait for more information but theprof's comparison saved me looking through it tomorrow morning, so it just tipped it in his favour enough to make my decision. As I said I'll go into more depth when I have more time. But Outlaw seems to be trying his best to just tip-toe his way around and has made a few slip-ups which are unbecoming of him. So, out of everything I've seen thus far, I'm going to have to accuse him. |
You read prof's chart? My contributions have increased slightly before/after. That's how I read it at least. Your comprehension on my first quoted post is severely lacking as I'm clearly talking about rules of the game, not any questions period. The second quoted post was a literal answer to a question, and helped me understand some personality behind the name. I don't see how I'm slipping up and tip toeing, whereas you attribute Wright's posting (my finger is still pointed at you Wrong) to a style of play. It's aggravating and a double standard.
