By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
S.Peelman said:

Uhm, maybe I'm overlooking something and being stupid, but...

I don't think it says that.

It said revenue and cost of revenue increased by an amount, not what amount it increased to. Wouldn't we need to know from what number both increased to come to any sort of conclusion?

EDIT: Yeah, Ka-Pi sort of Ninja'd this observation.

Well, that would be easy since we have the 72% number.

It was 2.9B but is now 5B



The One and Only

VizionEck.com